Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix BuildRun Status source #1411

Conversation

SaschaSchwarze0
Copy link
Member

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 commented Oct 18, 2023

Changes

In Beta, we have only one source. This must be reflected in the status as well as it is rendered in the full BuildRun in our workshop output.

TBD: I am not finding the code that converts the status of a Beta BuildRun to Alpha. I guess that's not existing because we do not need this yet because our controller always stores the status in alpha @qu1queee ?

Submitter Checklist

  • Includes tests if functionality changed/was added
  • Includes docs if changes are user-facing
  • Set a kind label on this PR
  • Release notes block has been filled in, or marked NONE

Release Notes

NONE

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API labels Oct 18, 2023
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 added this to the release-v0.12.0 milestone Oct 18, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the release-note-none Label for when a PR does not need a release note label Oct 18, 2023
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 18, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 18, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from HeavyWombat October 18, 2023 20:38
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 changed the title WIP Fix BuildRun Status source Fix BuildRun Status source Oct 19, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 19, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@qu1queee qu1queee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 19, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 19, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: qu1queee

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 19, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 586adf0 into shipwright-io:main Oct 19, 2023
12 checks passed
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 deleted the sascha-fix-buildrun-status-source branch August 7, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Label for when a PR does not need a release note size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants